Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Kolkata v. Pramod Kumar Saraf
High Court
07 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Kolkata v. Pramod Kumar Saraf
Date of order
07 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Kolkata v. Pramod Kumar Saraf, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: In the light of the same, this appeal stands disposed of as no further orders are required in the matter and the substantial questions of law suggested are left open.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
OD-3
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE
ITAT/295/2024 IA NO: GA/1/2025
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA VS PRAMOD KUMAR SARAF
BEFORE :
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS) Date : 7[th] March, 2025
Appearance :Mr. Smarajit Roychowdhury, Adv. Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv.…for appellant Mr. S.M. Surana, Adv. Mr.Bhaskar Sengupta, Adv. …for respondent
The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is directed against the order dated August 28, 2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) in I.T.A No. 683/Kol/2024, for the assessment year 2014-15.
We have heard Mr. Smarajit Roychowdhury, learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. S.M. Surana, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/assessee submitted that the assessee has opted for settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2014 and an application has been filed on 18[th] January, 2025.
In the light of the same, this appeal stands disposed of as no further orders are required in the matter and the substantial questions of law suggested are left open.
In the event the application filed by the assessee under the Scheme is not accepted, then liberty is granted to the either-side to seek for restoration of this appeal to be heard and decided on merits.
The stay application being IA No: GA/1/2025 also stands disposed of.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.)
(CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.