Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai v. Orocract Jewels Pvt. Ltd
High Court
26 Feb 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai v. Orocract Jewels Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
26 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai v. Orocract Jewels Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
SANTOSHSUBHASHKULKARNIDigitally signed bySANTOSH SUBHASHKULKARNIDate: 2022.02.2811:20:32 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2463 OF 2020IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.820 OF 2020ANDINTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2465 OF 2020ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.821 OF 2020AND
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2466 OF 2020
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.822 OF 2020
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai ...ApplicantIn the matter betweenPrincipal Commissioner of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai ...Appellant
Versus
Orocract Jewels Pvt. Ltd.
...Respondent
Mr. Sham Walve, for the Applicant/Appellant.
CORAM:K. R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJDATED:26[th] FEBRUARY, 2022
-PC:
1.Heard Mr. Walve and considered the application.
2.For the reasons mentioned in the application and in viewof the relaxation granted by the Hon’ble Apex Court for thepurpose of limitation, in our view, these applications can beallowed. Accordingly delay is condoned. of the relaxation granted by the Hon’ble Apex Court for thepurpose of limitation, in our view, these applications can beallowed. Accordingly delay is condoned.
3.Interim applications accordingly disposed.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
[K. R. SHRIRAM, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.