Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S. Protective Mercantile & Trading Ltd
High Court
25 Jul 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S. Protective Mercantile & Trading Ltd
Date of order
25 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S. Protective Mercantile & Trading Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Shridhar Sutar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 557 OF 2015
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-5
… Appellant
Versus
M/s. Protective Mercantile & Trading Ltd.
… Respondent
…..
Mr. N. C. Mohanty, for the Appellant.
Mr. Satish Mody a/w Ms. Aasifa Khan for the Respondent.
…..
CORAM :S. V. GANGAPURWALA ANDA. M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE :25th JULY, 2017
P. C. :
1.The appeal is pertains to assessment year 2004-05.
2.We have heard learned Counsel for the Appellant and the learned Counsel for the Respondent.
3.The issue in the present Appeal is about deleting the disallowances of deduction under Section 80I(B)(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It is covered by the Judgment of the Apex
Court in the case of C.I.T. Central Pune Vs. M/s. Veena Developers in the Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.
22450 of 2011 and other connected matters on 28[th] April, 2015 and the Judgment and order of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Brahma Associates reported in
[2011] 333 ITR 289 (Bom).
4.In view of above, no substantial question of law arises in the present Appeal. Hence, Appeal is dismissed. No costs.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
(S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.