Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 5 v. Shri Hari Associates
High Court
19 Jul 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 5 v. Shri Hari Associates
Date of order
19 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
2005-06, 2007-08, 2008-09
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 5 v. Shri Hari Associates, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the above, present Tax Appeals stand disposed of as not pressed with the above liberty.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 858 of 2018With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 820 of 2018With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 859 of 2018With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 860 of 2018
======================================
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5VersusSHRI HARI ASSOCIATES
======================================Appearance:
MR MANISH BHATT, SENIOR ADVOCATE with MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the APPELLANT(s) No. 1MR VIJAY S RANJAN(6126) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1======================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAHandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE
Date : 19/07/2018
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH)
1.Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common order passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench, Ahmedabad(hereinafter referred to as “the learned Tribunal”) in IT(SS)A No.128/Ahd/2014 for the Assessment Year 2005-06, IT(SS)A No.129/Ahd/2014 for the Assessment Year 2006-07, IT(SS)A No.130/Ahd/2014 for the Assessment Year 2007-08 and ITA No.1874/Ahd/2011 for the Assessment Year 2008-09, revenue has preferred the present Tax Appeals.
2.Shri Vijay Ranjan, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent – assessee has stated at the Bar that after the impugned common order was passed by the learned Tribunal, the revenue /Department preferred Miscellaneous Application Nos.32 to 35/Ahd/2018 for rectification of the impugned common order and vide order dated 06/07/2018 learned Tribunal has recalled the impugned common order and has restored the Appeals to file for re-hearing. He has submitted that however such an order is recently passed but copy is not available. However, as such, the order has been pronounced in the open Court. He has also placed on record the copy of the Miscellaneous Application No.35/Ahd/2018, which is directed to be taken on record.
3.In that view of the matter, Shri Manish Bhatt, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the revenue does not press the present Tax Appeals as the common order passed by the learned Tribunal impugned in the present Tax Appeals is already reported to be recalled by the learned Tribunal, however has requested to reserved the liberty to revive the present Tax Appeals in case it is found that the impugned common order passed by the learned Tribunal impugned in the present Tax Appeals is not recalled. In view of the above, present Tax Appeals stand disposed of as not pressed with the above liberty.
(M.R. SHAH, J.)
(A.Y. KOGJE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.