Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7,...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7, Delhi v. M/S Pilot Industries Ltd. Through: None

High Court 19 Oct 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7, Delhi v. M/S Pilot Industries Ltd. Through: None
Date of order
19 Oct 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7, Delhi v. M/S Pilot Industries Ltd. Through: None, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Signature Not Verified $~2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decision delivered on: 19.10.2023 + ITA 576/2023 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7, DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr Sunil Agarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr Shivansh B. Pandya, Jr. Standing Counsel and Mr Utkarsh Tiwari, Adv. Counsel with Mr Shivansh B. Pandya, Jr. Standing Counsel and Mr Utkarsh Tiwari, Adv. versus M/S PILOT INDUSTRIES LTD. Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHERHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL): CM APPL. 53009/2023 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. ITA 576/2023 & CM APPL. 53007/2023 & 53008/2023 [Applications filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 354 (in CM No. 53007/2023) days in filing the appeal and delay of 47 days (in CM No. 53008/2023) in re-filing the appeal].CM No. 53007/2023) days in filing the appeal and delay of 47 days (in CM No. 53008/2023) in re-filing the appeal]. 2. This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11. 3. Via this appeal, the appellant/revenue seeks to assail the order dated 23.11.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short, 23.11.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short, ITA 576/2023 “Tribunal”]. 4. Although, even according to the appellant/revenue, there is a huge delay in filing the appeal, we are not required to deal with this aspect of the matter as Mr Sunil Agarwal, learned senior standing counsel, who appears on behalf of appellant/revenue, fairly informs us that the proposed questions of law raised in the present appeal are covered by a coordinate bench judgment rendered in the respondent’s/assessee’s case concerning AYs 2005-06 to 2009-10. 5. For this purpose, our attention has been drawn to the judgment passed in ITA Nos. 411/2022 to 414/2022 & 417/2022. These appeals are titled Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 vs Pilot Industries Limited, 2022/DHC/004464. 6. In these circumstances, the appeal and the applications are closed. 7. Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J. OCTOBER 19, 2023/RY Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan