Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax - 7 v. M/S Oriental Bank Of Commerce Through : None

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 33/2017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX - 7..... Appellant Through : Sh. Dileep Shivpuri, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Jr, Standing Counsel and Sh. Vikrant A. Maheshwari, Advocate. versus M/S ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE Through : None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R% 14.03.2017 The Revenue is aggrieved by the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which has the effect of upholding the deletion of penalty imposed upon the assessee. The Assessing Officer (AO) had rejected the assessee’s contention with respect to treatment of its assets which was changed from the classification – Available for Sale (AFS) to Held to Maturity (HTM). This was done pursuant to the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) circular dated 02.09.2004. Resultantly, the penalty was imposed. The ITAT upheld the deletion of penalty based upon the judgment of this Court for AY 2007-08, (Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Oriental Bank of Commerce, ITA 306/2016, decided on Page 1 of 2 11.05.2016). This Court has gone through the order dated 11.05.2016 which reveals that the issue with regard to treatment of such assets/stock-in-trade was contentious. This persuaded the Court to decide in favour of the assessee, unpersuaded by the decision of the Karnataka High Court in Karnataka Bank Ltd. v. ACIT 2013 (356) ITR 549. Since the ITAT has followed the decision of this Court, in the present instance, no question of law arises. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J MARCH 14, 2017/ajk NAJMI WAZIRI, J