Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S. Relx India Pvt. Ltd. Through None

High Court 27 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S. Relx India Pvt. Ltd. Through None
Date of order
27 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S. Relx India Pvt. Ltd. Through None, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 256/2018 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7..... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Standing Counsel. versus M/S. RELX INDIA PVT. LTD. Through None. ..... Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA % O R D E R27.02.2018 The Revenue’s appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) challenges the order of ITAT setting aside final re-assessment order made by the Assessing Officer (AO). The re-opening of assessment and the “reasons to believe” cited by the AO for issuing the re-assessment notice under Section 147 were based upon audit objections received by the Revenue. Such re-opening has been frowned upon as it is not in accordance with the judgment of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Kelvinator of India, 320 ITR 561. Moreover, on this specific issue, this Court has ruled against the Revenue in relying upon the judgments of several High Courts including Punjab and Haryana High Court and Madras High Court etc. In these circumstances, no question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J FEBRUARY 27, 2018 rc A. K. CHAWLA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan