Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Rahul Polymers Pvt. Ltd
High Court
26 Oct 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Rahul Polymers Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
26 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Rahul Polymers Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~45
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ITA 1127/2018
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7
..... Appellant
Through:Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Mr. AsheeshJain, Advocates.
versus
RAHUL POLYMERS PVT. LTD.
..... Respondent
Through:None.
CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHARJUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R%26.10.2018
CM APPL. 42716/2018 (Exemption)
1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
ITA 1127/2018
2. The issue in the present appeal by the Revenue against the order dated24[th]April 2018 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.2972/Del/2011 (being the Assessee’s appeal) for the Assessment Year 2006-07 concerns the value of the construction of a building in which theRespondent Assessee had invested and which was subject matter of theassessment. The list of dates set out by the revenue in the appeal itself isexplicit about the number of levels this issue has been examined and thereport of the Departmental Valuation Officer analysed. Before the ITATboth the Revenue and the Assessee were in appeal. The impugned order of
the ITAT has partly allowed the appeal of the Assessee while dismissing theappeal of the Revenue.
3. This being the fourth level of the litigation, and the determination beingbased purely on facts, the Court is unable to find any substantial question oflaw arising for determination.
4. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J.
OCTOBER 26, 2018nk
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.