Case Law › High Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S Sunstar Expositions Pvt. Ltd

High Court 08 Oct 2018 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

08 Oct 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S Sunstar Expositions Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Recording the aforesaid statement, the appeal is disposed of without answering the issue/question raised which is left open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 202/2018 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate versus M/S SUNSTAR EXPOSITIONS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kislaya Parashar, Advocate CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R% 08.10.2018 CM No.6266/2018 This is an application for condonation of delay of 71 days in refiling of the appeal. The delay in refiling of the appeal is not opposed. Accordingly, the application of delay in refiling of the appeal is allowed. ITA 202/2018 Counsel for the appellant/Revenue states that the tax effect in the present appeal is below Rs.50 Lacs and therefore, in terms of circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018, he is not pressing the present appeal. However, it may be clarified that the issue raised is left open and has not been decided on merit. Recording the aforesaid statement, the appeal is disposed of without answering the issue/question raised which is left open. SANJIV KHANNA, J OCTOBER 08, 2018 b CHANDER SHEKHAR, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.