Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 9 K...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 9 Kolkata v. I S Leather ………

High Court 20 Apr 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 9 Kolkata v. I S Leather ………
Date of order
20 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 9 Kolkata v. I S Leather ………, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For all those reasons, we do not think it fit to admit this appeal.This appeal and the connected application are accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ORDER SHEET ITA/12 OF 2021IA NO:GA/2/2021IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 KOLKATAVersusI S LEATHER……… BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I. P. MUKERJIAND The Hon’ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDINDate : 20 April, 2021. Mr. S. Chattopadhyay, Adv.…for the appellantMs. Sutapa Roy Chowdhury, Adv…for respondent. The Court: Today learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue hasproduced the audit objection documents, which are taken on record. Hence, we entertain this appeal. On going through the grounds made out in paragraph 8 of thepetition and on perusing the orders of the adjudicating authoritiesannexed to it we find that no ground, let alone any substantial questionof law has been raised. No details as to how any question of law arisesfrom the impugned order of the tribunal have been provided in thegrounds. There is no ground whatsoever from which this Court can evenform a prima facie opinion that the reasons given in paragraph 10 of thelearned tribunal’s order are erroneous in law and raise a substantialquestion to be tried by this Court. For all those reasons, we do not think it fit to admit this appeal.This appeal and the connected application are accordingly dismissed. (I.P. MUKERJI, J.) (MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan