Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-9, Kolkata v. Rahee Jhajharia E To E (Jv
High Court
31 Jul 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-9, Kolkata v. Rahee Jhajharia E To E (Jv
Date of order
31 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-9, Kolkata v. Rahee Jhajharia E To E (Jv, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax effect and the substantial questions of law are left open.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD – 3
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax]
ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA/35/2024
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9, KOLKATA VS. RAHEE JHAJHARIA E TO E (JV)
BEFORE :
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS) Dated : 31 July, 2025
Appearance :
Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv.(VC) Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv. …for Appellant Mr.J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, Adv. Mr. Mrigank Kejriwal, Adv. Ms. Sruti Dutta, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Singhi, Adv. ..for the Respondent
The Court : We have heard Mr. Tilak Mitra, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue and Mr. J. P. Khaintan, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the assessee/respondent.
This appeal filed by the Department under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is directed against the order dated December 16, 2022 passed by the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal, “C” - Bench, Kolkata in ITA No.135/Kol/2021 for the assessment year 2015-16.
As the tax effect involved in this appeal is less than the threshold limit mentioned in the Circular issued by CBDT, the revenue cannot pursue this appeal any further. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax effect and the substantial questions of law are left open.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, CJ.)
(CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.)
sm
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.