Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Asansol v. M/S. H S Virdi
High Court
08 Nov 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Asansol v. M/S. H S Virdi
Date of order
08 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Asansol v. M/S. H S Virdi, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence, the revenue cannot prosecute this appeal any further and the appeal stands disposed of on the ground of tax effect and the substantial questions of law are left open.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE
OD – 23
ITAT/194/2024 IA NO: GA/2/2024
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ASANSOL VS. M/S. H S VIRDI
BEFORE:
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM
AND Date : 8[th] November 2024.
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
APPEARANCE: Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate … for appellant.
The Court:- This appeal by the revenue filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is directed against the order dated 21[st]August 2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ Bench, Kolkata (the Tribunal) in ITA No.126/Kol/2023 for the assessment year 2012-13.
We have heard the learned advocate for the appellant.
Though three substantial questions of law have been suggested by the revenue in paragraph 16 of the memo of appeal, the tax effect involved in this appeal has been mentioned as Rs.8,96,232/-. Though the revenue takes a stand that the case falls under the exception clause of the concerned circular, it has not been clearly pointed out under which exception clause the revenue seeks to bring the matter. In the absence of any such specific averment, we are required to go by the quantum of tax
involved in this appeal which, admittedly, is lesser than the threshold limit. Hence, the revenue cannot prosecute this appeal any further and the appeal stands disposed of on the ground of tax effect and the substantial questions of law are left open.
(T. S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.)
S. Kumar
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.