Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner v. M/S. Hanumangarh Kendriya Sahakari Bank Ltd, Opp. Circuithouse, Hanumangarh
High Court
28 Aug 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner v. M/S. Hanumangarh Kendriya Sahakari Bank Ltd, Opp. Circuithouse, Hanumangarh
Date of order
28 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner v. M/S. Hanumangarh Kendriya Sahakari Bank Ltd, Opp. Circuithouse, Hanumangarh, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 1/2017
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner.
----Appellant
Versus
M/s. Hanumangarh Kendriya Sahakari Bank Ltd, Opp. CircuitHouse, Hanumangarh.
----Respondent
Connected With
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 98/2015
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bikaner
----Appellant
Versus
M/s Hanumangarh Kendriya Sahakari Bank Ltd., Opp. CircuitHouse, Hanumangarh Junction.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s)
For Respondent(s)
: Mr. G.S. Chouhan
: Mr. Surendra Singh Choudhary on behalf of Mr. Sanjeet Purohit
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA
28/08/2019
Order
In view of Circular No.17/2019 [F.No.279/MISC./142/2007-ITJ (PT.)] dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes,Government of India, New Delhi, as clarified vide communicationdated 20.08.2019, the tax effect involved in the present appeals
being less than Rs.1 crore, learned counsel appearing for theappellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeals.
Permission is granted.
The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
(P.K. LOHRA),J
89-90Vij/-
(SANGEET LODHA),J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.