Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central 1 Kolkata v. M/S. Orissa Metaliks Pvt. Ltd
High Court
03 Jul 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central 1 Kolkata v. M/S. Orissa Metaliks Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
03 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central 1 Kolkata v. M/S. Orissa Metaliks Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The substantial questions of law as framed in the order dated 11.07.2022 are answered in favour of the assessee and against the respondent. parties, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE
O – 143
ITA/51/2022
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 1 KOLKATA VS
M/S. ORISSA METALIKS PVT. LTD.
BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI AND
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA Date : 3[rd] July 2024.
Appearance:
Mr. Vipul Kundalia, Advocate Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate ... for appellant. Mr. Agnibesh Sengupta, Advocate Ms. Pritha Basu, Advocate Mr. Saptarshi Kar, Advocate ... for respondent.
1.Heard Sri Vipul Kundalia, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant and Sri Agnibesh Sengupta, learned counsel for the respondent. appellant and Sri Agnibesh Sengupta, learned counsel for the respondent.
2.Both the learned counsel for the parties jointly state that the questions involved in the present appeal are squarely covered by the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3 v. Abhisar Buildwell (P) Limited [2003] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) and in view thereof the present appeal deserves to be dismissed and the substantial questions of law deserve to be answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. involved in the present appeal are squarely covered by the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3 v. Abhisar Buildwell (P) Limited [2003] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) and in view thereof the present appeal deserves to be dismissed and the substantial questions of law deserve to be answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
3.In view of the statements jointly made by learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is dismissed. The substantial questions of law as framed in the order dated 11.07.2022 are answered in favour of the assessee and against the respondent. parties, the appeal is dismissed. The substantial questions of law as framed in the order dated 11.07.2022 are answered in favour of the assessee and against the respondent.
(SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.)
S. Kumar
(AJAY KUMAR GUPTA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.