Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-1, Kolkata v. M/S. Rungta Mines Ltd
High Court
03 Jan 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-1, Kolkata v. M/S. Rungta Mines Ltd
Date of order
03 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-1, Kolkata v. M/S. Rungta Mines Ltd, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Recording the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
OD-2
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE
IA No.GA 2 of 2017(Old No.GA 3362 of 2017)
In ITAT 338 of 2017
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA VERSUS
M/S. RUNGTA MINES LTD.
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM
AND
The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 3[rd] January, 2022.
Appearance: Mr. Subash Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Pranit Bag, Adv. …for the appellant.
The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata.
We have heard Mr. Subash Agarwal, learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue.
The learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue on instructions from the department submitted that the appeal cannot be pursued by the revenue on account of low tax effect.
Recording the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Consequently, substantial questions of law which have been raised are left
The application being IA GA 2 of 2017 (Old No. 3362 of 2017) for stay also stands dismissed.
(T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
s.pal/pkd
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.