Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2, Kolkata v. Smt Usha Garodia And Anr
High Court
26 Sep 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2, Kolkata v. Smt Usha Garodia And Anr
Date of order
26 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2, Kolkata v. Smt Usha Garodia And Anr, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Consequently, the appeal stands rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE
ITAT/182/2023IA NO: GA/1/2023, GA/2/2023
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-2, KOLKATAVSSMT USHA GARODIA AND ANR.
BEFORE :THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAMAndTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYADate : 26 September, 2023
Appearance : Ms. Smita Das De, Adv.…for appellant.Mr. Akhilesh Kr. Gupta, Adv.Mrs. Akshara Shukla, Adv.…for respondents.
The Court : - This appeal has been filed by the revenue belatedly. There is a delayof 1227 days in filing the appeal.
Heard learned advocates on either side.
Upon perusal of the affidavit filed in support of the condonation delay petition wefind that the so-called reasons are all administrative reasons and the substantial part ofthe delay has not been explained. Thus, in the absence of any convincing explanationfor the inordinate delay we are not persuaded to exercise any discretion in the matter.Accordingly, the application is dismissed. Consequently, the appeal stands rejected. Thequestions of law suggested by the revenue are left open.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM)
CHIEF JUSTICE
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.