Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ce...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v.

High Court 16 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v.
Date of order
16 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. , the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: 1,00,00,000/- and in view of the fact that the taxeffect in the present case is 50,00,000/- the present appeal is disposed of asnot pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~2 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +ITA 411/2019 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2 ..... AppellantThrough:Mrs. Vibhooti Malhotra, Sr. Standingcounsel with Mr.Siddharth Manocha,Adv. versus PAN REALTORS PVT. LTD., ..... Respondent Through:Mr. Rohan Khare, Adv. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAO R D E R % 16.09.2019 In the light of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes (JudicialSection), Government of India, which fixes the monetary limit in respect oftax effect, inter alia, before the High Court in which the Department couldpursue the matter as Rs. 1,00,00,000/- and in view of the fact that the taxeffect in the present case is 50,00,000/- the present appeal is disposed of asnot pressed. VIPIN SANGHI, J SEPTEMBER 16, 2019Pallavi SANJEEV NARULA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan