Case Law › High Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ce...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Sam India Builtwell (P) Ltd

High Court 03 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

03 Sep 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Sam India Builtwell (P) Ltd, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: 59,78,000/-, the present appeal is disposed of as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~27. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 312/2019 and CM APPL. 14806-14807/2019 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2 ..... Appellant Through: versus SAM INDIA BUILTWELL (P) LTD., ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. CS Anand and Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % O R D E R 03.09.2019 In the light of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes (Judicial Section), Government of India, which fixes the monetary limit in respect of tax effect, inter alia, before the High Court in which the Department could pursue the matter as Rs. 1,00,00,000/- and in view of the fact that the tax effect in the present case is Rs. 59,78,000/-, the present appeal is disposed of as not pressed. VIPIN SANGHI, J SEPTEMBER 03, 2019 B.S. Rohella SANJEEV NARULA, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.