Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-3 … v. Arkade Bhoomi Enterprises …
High Court
18 Dec 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-3 … v. Arkade Bhoomi Enterprises …
Date of order
18 Dec 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-3 … v. Arkade Bhoomi Enterprises …, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 710 OF 2019
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 322 OF 2017
WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 711 OF 2019ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 330 OF 2017WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 712 OF 2019IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 507 OF 2017
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3 … ApplicantIN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3 … AppellantVs.Arkade Bhoomi Enterprises … Respondent
…........
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Applicant/Appellant.Mr. Pratik Jain i/b. Agrud Partners for respondent.
…........
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR &M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 18 DECEMBER 2019
P.C.:-
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.Perused the Affidavits in support of the Notice ofMotion.
3.Learned counsel for the Appellant states that earlierthis Appeals were being looked after by the Panel Advocate whono longer continues on the Panel of Income Tax Department andin these circumstances, the Appeals went unattended when calledout. He tenders apology on behalf of the Appellant in view of thisposition.
4.Notice of Motions are allowed. Delay of 64 days infiling the Applications stands condoned.
5.Appeals stand restored to file. To be taken up as perturn.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.)
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
DikshaDigitallysigned byDikshaRaneRaneDate:2019.12.1917:02:22+0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.