Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ce...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-3 v. M/S Appolo Traexim (P) Ltd

High Court 11 Apr 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-3 v. M/S Appolo Traexim (P) Ltd
Date of order
11 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-3 v. M/S Appolo Traexim (P) Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~91 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 420/2018 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-3 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Advocates. versus M/S APPOLO TRAEXIM (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 11.04.2018 The Revenue appeals against the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which set aside the search assessment, on the ground that the additions made on account of disallowance determined pursuant to the search assessment, were not based upon seizures of any incriminating material recovered during the course of the search. The ITAT relied upon the decision of this Court in the case of ‘Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III vs. Kabul Chawla’, 380 ITR 573. In these circumstances, no question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J APRIL 11, 2018/nn A. K. CHAWLA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan