Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) – 4, Mumbai v. Income Tax Settlement Commissioner (Itsc),Mumbai & Ors

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 156 OF 2016IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2557 OF 2015 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) – 4, Mumbai..Petitioner Versus Income Tax Settlement Commissioner (ITSC),Mumbai & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.Kevic Setalwad with Mr.Girish Dave with Ms.Shushma Nagraj with Mr.N.C.Mohanty for Applicant / Orig.Petitioner.Ms.Prachi Dhanani with Mr.Shyam Gopal I/b. Veritas Legal for Respondent Nos.2 to 43. CORAM: M. S. SANKLECHA & S.C. GUPTE, JJ. DATE : 21 SEPTEMBER 2016 P.C.: This chamber summons has been taken out by the Petitionerto amend the petition, which is still awaiting admission. 2.Ms.Dhanani, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos.2to 43 has no objection if the amendment is allowed with liberty to contestthe merits of the amendment if allowed at the hearing of the petition. 3.In the above view, as the amendment is sought beforeadmission of the petition and is also not opposed by the Respondents,therefore, chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 4.Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today.Amended copy to be served upon the Respondents within one weekthereafter. The Respondents to file their reply, if any, to the amendedpetition within a period of two weeks of the amended petition beingserved. 5.All contentions on merits kept open. 6.At the joint request of Counsel, petition to be on board foradmission on 23 November 2016. (S.C. GUPTE, J.) (M. S. SANKLECHA, J.)