Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Shri Surinder Singh Saini
High Court
20 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Shri Surinder Singh Saini
Date of order
20 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Shri Surinder Singh Saini, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
LTTA-21-2018Date of Decision: 20.8.2018
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon
...Appellant.
Versus
Shri Surinder Singh Saini
...Respondent.
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN.
PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Sr. Standing Counsel with|
Mr. Arun Biriwal, Advocate andMs. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Aman Parti, Advocate and|Mr. Munish Kapila, Advocate for the respondent.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
inLearned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since thetax effect involved is=25,00,000/-, he has instructions to withdraw thepresent appeal in view of Circular No.03/2018, dated 11[th]July, 2018, issuedby the Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi. However, he has prayedthat liberty be granted to the revenue to file an application for revival of theappeal in case something survives therein,?DDismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is,however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not betaken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legalissue as Claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in anappropriate case.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
August 20, 2018-<
(AVNEESH JHINGAN)JUDGE
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.