Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Kolkata v. Mr. Subrata Banik
High Court
23 Nov 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Kolkata v. Mr. Subrata Banik
Date of order
23 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Kolkata v. Mr. Subrata Banik, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The said submissionis placed on record and the appeal stands disposed of on the groundof low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
OD-66
ITAT/354/2017IA NO: GA/2/2017(Old No.GA/3559/2017)IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)ORIGINAL SIDE
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-I, KOLKATAVERSUSMR. SUBRATA BANIK
BEFORE :
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAMAndTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYADate : 23[rd] November, 2021
Appearance :-
Ms. Sucharita Biswas, Adv.Mr. Asok Bhowmick, Adv.
… For Appellant… For Respondent
Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv.Mr. Avra Majumder, Adv.
The Court : This appeal by the assessee filed under Section260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, for brevity) is directedagainst the order dated 18[th] November, 2016 passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, “A” Bench, Kolkata in I.T.(S.S.)A. Nos. 83, 84,85 & 89/KOL/2013 for assessment years 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05and 2005-06. The appellant has raised the following questions of lawfor consideration :-
a)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case theHon’ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” Bench, KolkataHon’ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” Bench, Kolkata
erred in law in deleting the disallowance of claim ofadvertisement expenses as deferred revenue expenditure ?
b)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case theHon’ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” Bench, Kolkatajustified in law that the expenses incurred in previous year notrelated to assessment year in question can be allowed asdeferred revenue expenditure ?
We have heard Ms. Sucharita Biswas, learned Standing Counselappearing for the appellant revenue and Mr. J.P. Khaitan, learnedSenior Counsel appearing for the respondent assessee. LearnedStanding Counsel for the appellant submitted that the present appealis below the monetary limit fixed by the CBDT in their Circular andtherefore the revenue cannot pursue the appeal. The said submissionis placed on record and the appeal stands disposed of on the groundof low tax effect. Consequently, substantial questions of law are leftopen.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.