Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ce...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Jaipur v. Shri Puna Ram Jangid, G

High Court 05 Jan 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Jaipur v. Shri Puna Ram Jangid, G
Date of order
05 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Jaipur v. Shri Puna Ram Jangid, G, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B.INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 74 / 2015 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Jaipur ----Appellant Versus Shri Puna Ram Jangid, G-132, Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur (Raj.) ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Appellant(s) : Mr. KK Bissa For Respondent(s) : -- _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. MOOLCHANDANI Judgment 05/01/2017 From perusal of the judgment impugned, it is apparent thatthe additions made by the Assessing Officer to the taxable incomeof assessee were deleted by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal byadequate examination of facts and by arriving at a definite findingthat the same have been adequately explained, as such, theappeal does not involve any substantial question of law, hence,the same is dismissed. (G.R. MOOLCHANDANI)J. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Sanjay
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan