Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Del...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi-08 v. M/S S. Chand & Co. Ltd

High Court 09 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi-08 v. M/S S. Chand & Co. Ltd
Date of order
09 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
2007-2008
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi-08 v. M/S S. Chand & Co. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~26 & 27 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 161/2018 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-08 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue versus M/S S. CHAND & CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: None + ITA 162/2018 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-08, ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue versus M/S S. CHAND & CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R% 09.02.2018 The Revenue is aggrieved by two decisions of the ITAT which held that the opening of the assessment was unwarranted. The assessee had filed the books for the relevant assessment year (AY-2007-2008) and closing stock in respect of work declared to be in progress; the assessments were completed. The assessment notice was issued entirely based upon the audit objection which pointed out that the evaluation of stock was based on mere reappraisal Page 1 of 2 of the same record without any tangible material or information. The CIT and ITAT both upheld the re-assessment notice but delayed the assessment, after examining it on merits. The ITAT affirmed the CIT’s opinion but held that the re-assessment was unwarranted and relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in CIT Vs. PVS Beedis Pvt. Ltd. 1998 (9) SCC 272. This Court is of the opinion that these arguments are untenable in view of the subsequent decision of the Supreme Court in CIT Vs. Kelvinator of India Ltd, 320 ITR 561 (SC) with regard to the permissible framework within which the Revenue Authority can issue re-assessment notice. Nevertheless, the Court has also considered all the relevant previous decisions especially in the light of the amendments to Section 147 which has also inserted Explanation 1. For these reasons, this Court is of the opinion that no question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J FEBRUARY 09, 2018/P A. K. CHAWLA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan