Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, De...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-2 v. Bluebird Software Pvt. Ltd

High Court 11 Oct 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-2 v. Bluebird Software Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
11 Oct 2017
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-2 v. Bluebird Software Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 803/2017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-2, ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rahul Kaushik, Sr.Standing Counsel. versus BLUEBIRD SOFTWARE PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Salil Kapoor, Advocate with Ms.Ananya Kapoor, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R% 11.10.2017 C.M. 33761/2017 (delay in filing) & C.M. 33762/2017 (delay in re-filing) 1. For the reasons stated in the applications, delays in filing as well as re-filing is condoned and the applications are disposed of. ITA No. 803/2017 2. The questions of law sought to be urged by the Revenue in the present appeal against an order dated 20[th] October 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 966/Del/2012 for the Assessment Year 2005-06 stands covered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee by the decision of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Kabul Chawla [2016] 380 ITR 573 (Del). 3. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. OCTOBER 11, 2017 ‘anb’ S. MURALIDHAR, J. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan