Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, De...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-2 v. M/S. Bharat Hotels Ltd. Through

High Court 18 Jan 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-2 v. M/S. Bharat Hotels Ltd. Through
Date of order
18 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
2011-2012
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-2 v. M/S. Bharat Hotels Ltd. Through, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 50/2018 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-2 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advs. versus M/S. BHARAT HOTELS LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Prakash Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R 18.01.2018 CM No.1835/2018(exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. ITA No.50/2018 1. The Revenue has filed this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 08.06.2017 in ITA No. 4771/Del/2014 passed by the Ld. ITAT, Delhi Bench for the assessment year 2011-2012 whereby the Ld. Tribunal had dismissed the appeal of the Revenue. 2. In this appeal, the question of law sought to be urged by the Revenue is: ITA No.50/2018 Page 1 of 2 “Whether the Ld. ITAT was correct in allowing the claim of depreciation u/s 32 of the Act by holding that the assessee is owner of the Hotel Building and entitled to claim depreciation in relation to the Building in the circumstances of the case?” 3. This Court notices that an identical question of law had arisen in the assessee’s own case for previous assessment years, which was addressed by a Division Bench of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Bharat Hotels, [2016] 65 taxmann.com 39 (Del), and the same was answered in favour of the assessee. 4. In the circumstances therefore, the Revenue’s appeal has to fail. It is accordingly dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J JANUARY 18, 2018 A. K. CHAWLA, J ITA No.50/2018 Page 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan