Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, De...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-3 v. Anita Rani Mahajan

High Court 05 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-3 v. Anita Rani Mahajan
Date of order
05 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-3 v. Anita Rani Mahajan, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~27 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+WTA 4/2020 & CM APPLs. 4590-4592/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-3 ..... Petitioner Through:Ms. Vibhooti Malhitra andMr. Shailendera Singh, Advocates.Mr. Shailendera Singh, Advocates. versus ANITA RANI MAHAJAN ..... Respondent Through:Mr. Salil Kapoor and Mr. ShivanshPandya, Advocates.Pandya, Advocates. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAO R D E R % 05.02.2020 In the light of the Circular No. 5/2019 dated 05.02.2019 issued by theMinistry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes(Judicial Section), Government of India, which fixes the monetary limit inrespect of tax effect, inert alia, before the High Court in which theDepartment could pursue the matter as Rs. 1,00,00,000/- and in view of thefact that the tax effect in the present case is Rs. 3,82,576/-, the presentappeal is disposed of as not pressed. VIPIN SANGHI, J FEBRUARY 05, 2020nk SANJEEV NARULA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan