Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-8 v. Spice Distribution Ltd.through

$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI17+ITA 111/2017 & CM Nos. 4650-52/2017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-8 ..... Appellant Through:Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Advocate. Versus SPICE DISTRIBUTION LTD.Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHARJUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRIO R D E R %10.04.2017 CM Nos. 4650-51/2017 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM No. 4652/2017 (for delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 66 days in filing theappeal is condoned. The application is allowed. ITA 111/2017 & CM Nos. 4650-52/2017 3. This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 (‘the Act’) is directed against the order dated 1[st]July, 2016 passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No.4281/Del/2013pertaining to Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2010-11. 4. The question sought to be urged in the present appeal by the Revenueconcerns the deletion of additions made on account of advertisement expenses. The Revenue’s contention that these expenses are of a capitalnature has already been rejected by this Court by its decision dated 19[th]September, 2014 in ITA No.597 of 2014 for AY 2009-10. 5. The Court is not persuaded to take a different view. The appeal isdismissed.dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J. APRIL 10, 2017 sb NAJMI WAZIRI, J.