Case Law › High Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Dib...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Dibrugarh v. M/S Pengreegarh Tea Company Anand Para, Pengree, Digboi, Dist. Tinsukia

High Court 09 Jan 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · asghccis

Parties

Date of order

09 Jan 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Dibrugarh v. M/S Pengreegarh Tea Company Anand Para, Pengree, Digboi, Dist. Tinsukia, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: Taking note of the submission, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

GAHC010152662018 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : ITA 7/2019 1:PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DIBRUGARH VERSUS 1:M/S PENGREEGARH TEA COMPANY ANAND PARA, PENGREE, DIGBOI, DIST. TINSUKIA, 786174 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. N HAWELIA Advocate for the Respondent : BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. A.S. BOPANNAHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI 09.01.2019 (A.S. Bopanna, CJ) Heard Ms. N Hawelia, learned counsel for the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that she has instructions from thedepartment to withdraw the instant appeal as the prayer made therein is not pressed. Taking note of the submission, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. Registry will assign number to the appeal for the purpose of record. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.