Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax Faridabad v. M/S Mansha Builders And Contractors P. Ltd
High Court
15 Jul 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax Faridabad v. M/S Mansha Builders And Contractors P. Ltd
Date of order
15 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax Faridabad v. M/S Mansha Builders And Contractors P. Ltd, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH.
104ITA-82-2019 (O&M)Date of Decision : 15.07.2019
Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax Faridabad
... Appellant
Versus
M/s Mansha Builders and Contractors P. Ltd.
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Rajat Garg, Advocate forMr. Tajender K.Joshi, Advocate for the appellant.
HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.
CM;1308FCI];2019
This is an application under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 for
condoning 4 days delay in filing the present appeal,
The application is supported by a duly sworn affidavit.
For the reasons given in the application, the same is allowed and
delay of 4 days in filing of the appeal is condoned,
CM;1306FCI];2019
This is an application for condoning 47 days delay in re-filing the
present appeal.
The application is supported by a duly sworn affidavit.
For the reasons given in the application, the same is allowed anddelay of 47 days in re-filing of the appeal is condoned.
Main case
The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue under Section260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'E' New Delhi.
Before proceeding further, from the perusal of the appeal it isforthcoming that the amount involved in the present appeal is onlyRs.3,30,960/-.
Learned counsel for the appellant has not disputed the fact that thetax effect involved in the present appeal is less than the monetary limitsfixed by Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by Central BoardDirect Taxes, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department ofRevenue. He seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal in view of thesaid circular. He has prayed that liberty be granted to the Revenue to fileapplication for revival in case something survives.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. The legalissues claimed by the Revenue are left open for adjudication in anappropriate case.
(AJAY TEWARI )JUDGE
15.07.2019pooja saini
( HARNARESH SINGH GILL )JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned?
Whether reportable?
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.