Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. M/S Nhpc Ltd
High Court
14 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. M/S Nhpc Ltd
Date of order
14 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. M/S Nhpc Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
1.
ITA No.249 of 2015 (O&M)Date of Decision: 14.02.2018
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad
…..Appellant
versus
M/s NHPC Ltd.
…..Respondent
2.
ITA No.322 of 2015 (O&M)
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad
…..Appellant
versus
M/s NHPC Ltd.
…..Respondent
3.
ITA No.360 of 2015 (O&M)…..Appellant
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad
versus
M/s NHPC Ltd.
…..Respondent
4.
ITA No.366 of 2015 (O&M)
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad
…..Appellant
M/s NHPC Ltd.
versus
…..Respondent
ITA No.249 of 2015 (O&M)
CORAM:HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.J.VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICEHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present:-Mr.T.K.Joshi, Senior Standing Counselfor the appellant(s)- Revenue.Mr. Ved Jain, Advocatefor the respondent (s).
***
S.J.VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL)
These appeals are against the order of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal in respect of the assessment years 2002-03, 2004-05,2000-01 and 2003-04 respectively. The questions of law raised in theseappeals are same as those raised in the assessee case ITA No.151 of 2015which pertains to the assessment year 2001-02.
By a separate order and judgment passed today, we disposed ofITA No.151 of 2015. It is agreed that the result in these appeals follows theresult of ITA No.151 of 2015. The appeals are, accordingly, disposed of inthe same terms namely that the questions of law are answered in favour ofthe respondent-assessee.
Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed.
(S.J. VAZIFDAR) CHIEF JUSTICE
14.02.2018
anju
(AVNEESH JHINGAN) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasonedYes/NoWhether reportable Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.