Case Law › High Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I,...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh v. M/S Pacific India, Chandigarh

High Court 19 Mar 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

19 Mar 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh v. M/S Pacific India, Chandigarh, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA-347-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.3.2019 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh Versus ....Appellant. M/s Pacific India, Chandigarh ...Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL. PRESENT: Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Sr. Standing Counsel for the appellant. *** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. For orders, see ITA-334-2018 (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh v. M/s Pacific India, Chandigarh). (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE March 19, 2019gbs (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL)JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Whether Reportable Yes/NoYes/No

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.