Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Coimbatore v. Shri Mathew Jose
High Court
26 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Coimbatore v. Shri Mathew Jose
Date of order
26 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
2011-12, 2011-2012
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Coimbatore v. Shri Mathew Jose, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 26.10.2018
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
and
The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Tax Case Appeal No.860 of 2017
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Coimbatore...AppellantVsShri Mathew Jose...Respondent
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 29.6.2017 in ITA No.541/Mds/2017 onthe file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai 'A'Bench for the assessment year 2011-12 Appeal filed againstthe order of the commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals )-2Comimbatore made in ITA NO.271/14-15 DT.30.12.2016 for theAssessment year 2011-2012 against the proceedings of theAssistant commissioner of Income Tax Circle -II coimbatoremadi in PAN :ADAJ/5385Q/2014-2015 DT.26.09.2014 against theorder of the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range -II63,Race cource Road,Coimabtore 641 018 made in PANABAPT5385Q for the Assessment year 2011-2012.For Appellant : Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar & Ms.K.G.UsharaniFor Respondent : No appearance
Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decidedthe issue in favour of the assessee.
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal on accountof low tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated11.7.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissedas withdrawn and the substantial questions of law raised
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
are left open. In the event the tax effect is above thethreshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty isgranted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court torestore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Co)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench.
2.The commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals )-2 Comimbatore.
3.The Assistant commissioner of Income Tax Circle -IIcoimbatore4.The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range -II ,Coimabtore 641 018+1cc to Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar , Advocate SR.No. 73302TCA.No.860 of 2017
ASK(16/11/2018)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.