Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (It...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (It & Tp v. Outech Gmbh & Co. Kg

High Court 20 Jan 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (It & Tp v. Outech Gmbh & Co. Kg
Date of order
20 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (It & Tp v. Outech Gmbh & Co. Kg, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: Consequently, the appeal stands disposed of as the respondent/assessee has availed the benefit of the said scheme and also paid the tax.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

OD-1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE ITA 29 of 2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT & TP) VERSUS OUTECH GMBH & CO. KG. C/O OUTOTECH INDIA PVT. LTD. BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 20[th] January, 2022. Appearance: Mr. S.N. Dutta, Adv. …for the appellant. Ms. Nilanjana Banerjee Pal, Adv. ...for the respondent. The Court : This appeal by the Revenue filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is directed against the order dated 16.06.2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ Bench, Kolkata (the Tribunal) in ITA Nos. 431/Kol/2014 and ITA No.283/Kol/2015 for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12. The appeal was admitted on 27.02.2020 to decide the following substantial questions of law: I)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the subject sale and supply of designs and drawings by the assessee resulted in income which accrued in India? Heard Mr. S.N. Dutta, learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant and Ms. Nilanjana Banerjee Pal, learned counsel for the respondent/assessee. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/assessee submitted that the assessee has availed the benefit of Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and the entire tax arrears have been remitted and Form No.5 dated 03.07.2020 has been issued by the appropriate authority. In the light of the same, the appeal need not be decided on merits. Consequently, the appeal stands disposed of as the respondent/assessee has availed the benefit of the said scheme and also paid the tax. Consequently, the substantial question of law is left open. (T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) s.pal/pkd
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan