Case Law › High Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ja...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-2, Jaipur v. M/S Adinath Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., K

High Court 05 Oct 2017 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

05 Oct 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-2, Jaipur v. M/S Adinath Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., K, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In that view of the matter the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 268 / 2017 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur-2, Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus M/s Adinath Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., K-21, Sunny House, Malviya Marg, C-scheme,, Jaipur ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Appellant(s) : Mr. K. D. Mathur on behalf ofMr. R. B. Mathur For Respondent(s) : _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR VYASJudgment 05/10/2017 Learned counsel for the appellant states that he wantsto file review application before the Tribunal. In that view of the matter the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn. If review application is filed, the tribunal willconsidered the same in accordance with law. (VIJAY KUMAR VYAS),J. (K.S. JHAVERI),J. B.M.G/Gourav/40

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.