Case Law › High Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ja...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar 1, Jalandhar v. M/S Max India Limited, Nawanshahar

High Court 08 Mar 2017 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

08 Mar 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar 1, Jalandhar v. M/S Max India Limited, Nawanshahar, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Gurbax SinghIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 2017.03.24 11:05CHANDIGARH ITA No. 91 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.3.2017 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar 1, Jalandhar Vs. ……Appellant M/s Max India Limited, Nawanshahar. …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: Mr.Vivek Sethi, Advocate for the appellant. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J. ��Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar 1, Jalandhar vs. M/s Max India Limited, Bhai Mohan Singh Nagar, Rail Majra, District Nawanshahar). (Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge March 08, 2017 ‘gs’ (Ramendra Jain) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.