Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ja...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur, Districtsinghbhum East v. Uranium Corporation Of India, Jadugura Mines, Singhbhum East

High Court 05 Apr 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur, Districtsinghbhum East v. Uranium Corporation Of India, Jadugura Mines, Singhbhum East
Date of order
05 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur, Districtsinghbhum East v. Uranium Corporation Of India, Jadugura Mines, Singhbhum East, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Amrita Sinha, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHITax Appeal No. 75 of 2018 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamshedpur, DistrictSinghbhum East --- --- Appellant Versus Uranium Corporation of India, Jadugura Mines, Singhbhum East --- --- Respondent ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARYThrough Video Conferencing For the Appellant For the Respondent : Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate : Mr. Sudarshan Shrivastava, Advocate 08/05.04.2021The appeal was directed against the order dated 02.05.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ranchi Bench at Ranchi in I.T.A. No. 161/Ran/2016 for the assessment year 2012-13. Learned counsel for the appellant department on written instruction seeks permission to withdraw this appeal since the assesse has opted for availing the benefit of Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 in respect of the instant lis relating to the assessment year 2012-13. The email enclosing the instructions have also been forwarded by learned counsel for the appellant and be it kept on record. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that only after withdrawal of the appeal, Form-5 can be issued to the assesse. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that necessary processes are being followed by the assesse in respect of the application made under Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. However, issuance of Form-5 by the department is awaited. Upon consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and in the light of the specific submission made on instruction by the learned counsel for the appellant Ms. Amrita Sinha, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) (Anubha Rawat Choudhary)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan