Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ko...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata –11, Kol v. M/S. Somdatt Builders Simplex J.v

High Court 23 Dec 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata –11, Kol v. M/S. Somdatt Builders Simplex J.v
Date of order
23 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
β€”
Outcome
Dismissed

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata –11, Kol v. M/S. Somdatt Builders Simplex J.v, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITAT/103/2017IA No.GA/1/2017(Old No.GA/861/2017),IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA –11, KOLVersusM/S. SOMDATT BUILDERS SIMPLEX J.V. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I. P. MUKERJI The Hon'ble JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA Date : 23[rd] December, 2020. Appearance:Mr. S.N. Dutta, Adv.Mr. Manabenda Nath Bandopadhayay, Adv. Ms. Nilanjana Banerjee (Pal), Adv. The Court: Mr. Dutta, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that the taxeffect is below Rs.1 crore. By virtue of the circular of the Central Board of Direct Taxes dated 11[th] July,2018 and the clarification dated 20[th] August, 2019 read with the circularno.17/2019 [F.NO.279/MISC.142/2007-ITJ(PT.)], dated 8[th] August, 2019, theappellant cannot proceed with the appeal. Accordingly, this appeal ITAT (103 of 2017) and the connected application(IA No.GA/1/2017(Old No.GA/861/2017) are dismissed as not pressed.Interim order, if any, is vacated. (I. P. MUKERJI, J.) (KAUSIK CHANDA, J.) cs.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan