Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ko...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata 2 v. M/S. Spencer's Retail Limited

High Court 10 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata 2 v. M/S. Spencer's Retail Limited
Date of order
10 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata 2 v. M/S. Spencer's Retail Limited, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Issue: (b)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the caseconclusion arrived at by the Learned Tribunal in quashing the order of theCIT passed under Section 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961 is perverse ?” We have heard Mr.

Decision: In light of the same, the appeal stands disposed of on the said ground.Consequently, the substantial questions of law are left open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

ORDER SHEETIA NO. GA/2/2017(Old No:GA/3070/2017)In ITAT/321/2017IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA 2VsM/S. SPENCER'S RETAIL LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM And The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 10 DECEMBER, 2021 Appearance:Mr. P. K. Bhowmik, Adv.Mr. Arunava Ganguly, Adv.…For the Appellant Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, Adv.Mr. A. K. Dey, Adv.…For the Respondent The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of theIncome Tax Act (the ‘Act’ in brevity) is directed against the order dated 18[th]November, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench,Kolkata (the ‘Tribunal’) in ITA No.908/Kol/2016 for the assessment year 2011-12. The revenue has raised the following substantial questions of law forconsideration : “(a)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case theLearned Tribunal has erred in law in quashing the order of CIT passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by disregarding the specific findingof the CIT that the assessing officer in course of assessment failed toexamine at all the issues in question and there was under assessment andunder charging of the tax ? (b)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the caseconclusion arrived at by the Learned Tribunal in quashing the order of theCIT passed under Section 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961 is perverse ?” We have heard Mr. P. K. Bhowmik, learned Standing Counsel appearingfor the appellant/revenue and Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, learned Counsel withMr. A. K. Dey, Learned Advoate appearing for the respondent/assessee. It is submitted by the Learned Counsel for the respondent that theassessee has availed the benefit of Vivad Se Biswas Scheme and Form-5 hasbeen issued on 8[th] April, 2021. In light of the same, the appeal stands disposed of on the said ground.Consequently, the substantial questions of law are left open. The application being GA No. IA NO.GA/2/2017 (Old No.3070 of 2017)is disposed of. (T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan