Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-3, Kolkata v. Patton Developers Pvt. Ltd
High Court
17 Jan 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-3, Kolkata v. Patton Developers Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
17 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-3, Kolkata v. Patton Developers Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE
ITAT 358 of 2017 IA No.GA 1 of 2017 (Old No. GA 3604 of 2017), GA 2 of 2017 (Old No. GA 3605 of 2017)
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-3, KOLKATA VERSUS PATTON DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM
AND
The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 17[th] January, 2022.
Appearance: Mr. Debasish Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Soumen Bhattacharya, Adv. …for the appellant.
The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata.
We are satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. Accordingly, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application being IA No. GA 1 of 2017 (Old No. GA 3604 of 2017) for condonation of delay stands allowed.
The learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue has given instructions to the effect that this appeal cannot be prosecuted by the appellant/revenue on the ground of low tax effect.
Recording the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Consequently, substantial questions of law which have been raised are left open.
The application being IA No. GA 2 of 2017 (Old No. GA 3605 of 2017) for stay also stands dismissed.
(T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
s.pal/pkd
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.