Case Law › High Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pa...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula v. Shri Sanjeev Kumar

High Court 26 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

26 Jul 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula v. Shri Sanjeev Kumar, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA-356-2016 Date of Decision: 26.7.2018 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula Versus ...Appellant. Shri Sanjeev Kumar ...Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN. PRESENT: Mr. Yogesh Putney, Sr. Standing Counsel for the appellant. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. 1.Letter dated 25.7.2018 is taken on record. 2.Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since thetax effect involved is ` 21,27,267/-, he has instructions to withdraw thepresent appeal in view of Circular No.03/2018, dated 11[th] July, 2018, issuedby the Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi. However, he has prayedthat liberty be granted to the revenue to file an application for revival of theappeal in case something survives therein. 3.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is,however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not betaken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legalissue as claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in anappropriate case. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE July 26, 2018gbs (AVNEESH JHINGAN) JUDGE Whether Speaking/ReasonedWhether Reportable Yes/NoYes/No

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.