Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Navratna Organizers And Developers Pvt Ltd
High Court
01 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Navratna Organizers And Developers Pvt Ltd
Date of order
01 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Navratna Organizers And Developers Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: Tax appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 1193 of 2018
==========================================================
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVersus
M/S NAVRATNA ORGANIZERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MR BHATT, SENIOR ADVOCATE with MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA
Date : 01/10/2018
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
1. Revenue is in appeal against judgment of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal dated 28.3.2018. Tribunal remanded the proceedings for consideration of CIT (Appeals) on the ground that the appeal order was ex-parte.
Learned counsel for the appellant is
justified in making a grievance that the Tribunal did not put some check or
restriction on the assessee so that sense of
seriousness is brought about in the
proceedings. In our prima facie view, even if
the Tribunal was inclined to grant
opportunity
to
participate
in
the
proceedings, at least imposition of fair
C/TAXAP/1193/2018 ORDER
amount of cost could have been considered. This would bring in a level of seriousness required on the part of the assessee while facing assessment proceedings. However, only for such purpose, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal, since otherwise we do not find any question of law arising. In future assure the Tribunal would bear in mind these observations.
2. Tax appeal is disposed of accordingly.
(AKIL KURESHI, J)
K.K. SAIYED
(B.N. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.