Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Royal Recycling Industries
High Court
14 Mar 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Royal Recycling Industries
Date of order
14 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
2011-2012, 2001-2002, 2002-2003
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Royal Recycling Industries, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench dated 11[th] September 2017, raising the following question for our consideration : “Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of Rs.
Decision: Tax Appeal is dismissed. [Akil Kureshi, J.] Prakash [B.N Karia, J.]
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL No. 195 of 2018
=============================================================
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVersusM/S ROYAL RECYCLING INDUSTRIES
=============================================================
Appearance :Mrs MAUNA M BHATT, Advocate for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1Mr B S SOPARKAR, Advocate for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1=============================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA14[th] March 2018
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench dated 11[th] September 2017, raising the following question for our consideration :
“Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of Rs. 9,49,91,927/= made under Section 10B by ignoring the Statutory report of Auditor in form no. 56G, also ignoring the vital and legally admissible evidences proving that manufacturing activity was started in FY 2000-2001 ?”
Issue pertains to the assessee’s claim of deduction under Section 10B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for A.Y 2011-2012. As is well-known, such deduction would be available for ten consecutive years from the commencement of the assessee’s business. Revenue treated such commencement from AY 2001-2002 as against the assessee’s claim that the entire operations; including manufacturing activities, started only during the period relevant to AY 2002-2003. The Revenue relied on a clinching reference to Auditor’s report that the manufacturing activities commenced on 26[th] October 2000. As against this, the assessee placed voluminous evidence before the Assessing Officer which was examined by the Tribunal to come to the conclusion that the manufacturing of production commenced only during the financial year 2001-2002. We have perused the observations of the Tribunal in this respect and find that the entire issue is purely factual in nature. On the basis of material on record, the Tribunal has come to a definite factual finding.
No question of law arises. Tax Appeal is dismissed.
[Akil Kureshi, J.]
Prakash
[B.N Karia, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.