In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Pratap Uttam Purohit, the High Court decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned bySHRADDHASHRADDHAKAMLESHKAMLESHTALEKARTALEKARDate:2022.07.0416:17:54+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 446 OF 2018
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
.. Appellant
Vs.
Pratap Uttam Purohit
.... Respondent
****
Mr.Arvind Pinto for appellant.
****
CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR ANDABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATE : 29[th] JUNE 2022
PC :
1.Learned counsel for the appellant to take steps to serve the
respondent and fle affdavit of service before the next date.
2.List on 27[th] July 2022.
[ABHAY AHUJA, J.]
[DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.