Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Raghunath Singh Thakur
High Court
19 Apr 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Raghunath Singh Thakur
Date of order
19 Apr 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Raghunath Singh Thakur, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the above stated position, we deem it proper to allow the review petitions and recall the judgment dated 13[th] April, 2016, passed by this Court in ITAs No.30, 35 and 36 of 2012.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMP(M) Nos.2040 of 2016, 382,
383 of 2017, Review Petition Nos.20, 18 & 19 of 2017 Date of decision: 19.04.2017
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
..Petitioner
Versus
Raghunath Singh Thakur . Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr.Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, with
Mr.Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr.Vishal Mohan, Advocate.
________________________________________________________________________________
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (oral)
CMP(M) Nos. 2040 of 2016, 382 and 383 of 2017
The applicant-petitioner has laid these limitation
petitions for condonation of delay, which has crept–in in filing
the review petitions.
2. We have gone through the limitation petitions and are of the considered view that the applicant-petitioner has carved out sufficient cause for condoning the delay. Hence, the delay in filing the review petitions is condoned. Accordingly, the applications are disposed of.
Review Petition Nos.20, 18 and 19 of 2017
3. Review petitions are taken on Board.
4. Issue notice. Mr.Vishal Mohan, Advocate, waives notice on behalf of the respondent.
5. The instant review petitions have been moved for review of common judgment dated 13[th] April, 2016, passed by this Court in ITAs No.30, 35 and 36 of 2012.
6. Learned counsel for the parties stated that the judgment under review has been inadvertently passed on their statement, since these Income Tax Appeals do not fall under the ambit of circular No.21/2015 issued vide F.No.279/Mis.142/2007-ITJ(Pt) by Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, dated 10.12.2015.
7. In view of the above stated position, we deem it proper to allow the review petitions and recall the judgment dated 13[th] April, 2016, passed by this Court in ITAs No.30, 35 and 36 of 2012. Ordered accordingly.
8. The review petitions are disposed of accordingly.Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
List ITA Nos.30, 35 and 36 of 2012 on 5[th] July,
2017.
( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Chief Justice Chief Justice
April 19, 2017
(tilak/vt)
( Sandeep Sharma ) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.