Case Law › High Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax ……...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax …… v. The Joint Secretary Organizing Committee For Winter Games 2009 ……

High Court 08 Nov 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · ukhcucis_pg

Parties

Date of order

08 Nov 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax …… v. The Joint Secretary Organizing Committee For Winter Games 2009 ……, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: All these Income Tax Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Income Tax Appeal No. 10 of 2019 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax ……....appellant Vs. The Joint Secretary Organizing Committee For Winter Games 2009 …….....Respondent With Income Tax Appeal No. 11 of 2019 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax ……....appellant Vs. The Joint Secretary Organizing Committee For Winter Games 2009 …….....Respondent With Income Tax Appeal No. 12 of 2019 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) ……....appellant Vs. The Joint Secretary Organizing Committee For Winter Games 2009 …….....Respondent Present:- Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax-appellant. Coram: Hon’ble Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J.Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax, seeks permission to withdraw all these three Appeals. All these Income Tax Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. (Alok Kumar Verma, J.) (Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ.) 08.11.2019 NEHA/JKJ

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.