Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax1, Chandigarh v. M/S S.k.& Company
High Court
31 Oct 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax1, Chandigarh v. M/S S.k.& Company
Date of order
31 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax1, Chandigarh v. M/S S.k.& Company, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
ITA No. 201 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 31.10.2018
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax1, Chandigarh.
…..Appellant
versus
M/s S.K.& Company
….Respondents
CORAM:HON’ BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI, CHIEF JUSTICEHON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI, JUDGEHON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI, JUDGE
Present : Ms. Urvashi Dugga, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Akshay Bhan, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate, for the respondents.
****
KRISHNA MURARI, C.J.(oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant sought leave of the Court to
permit withdrawal of the appeal.
Prayer made is allowed.
Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
31. 10.201&ravinder
(KRISHNA MURARI)|CHIEBF JUSTICE |
(ARUN PALLI)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
√Yes/No Yes/No√
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue