Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxcorp...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxcorporate Circle – 1, Coimbatore v. M/S.chiranjeevi Wind Energy Ltd

High Court 15 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxcorporate Circle – 1, Coimbatore v. M/S.chiranjeevi Wind Energy Ltd
Date of order
15 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
β€”
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxcorporate Circle – 1, Coimbatore v. M/S.chiranjeevi Wind Energy Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned ITAT is right in law in holding that the judgment of CIT vs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15.10.2024 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMARAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN T.C.A.No.534 of 2023 Principal Commissioner of Income TaxCorporate Circle – 1, Coimbatore...Appellant Vs. M/s.Chiranjeevi Wind Energy Ltd.45/3A, Arts College RoadOpp. To Bala LodgeCoimbatore – 641 018PAN: AAACC876 1H..Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal β€œB” Bench,Chennaidated27.06.2023passedin I.T.A.No.1879/CHNY/2018. For the Appellant:Mr.Karthik RanganathanSenior Standing Counsel For the Respondent:Mr.A.S.Sriraman JUDGMENT (Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)The present tax case appeal was admitted on 02.11.2023 by this Court on the following substantial questions of law:- https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis "1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned ITAT is right in law in holding that the judgment of CIT vs. Kelvinator of India Ltd., (320 ITR 561) is applicable to this case at hand? 2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned ITAT and learned CIT (A), has erred in appreciating that, the issue sought to have been addressed by reopening u/s 147 & 148 was the invalid revising of the ROI on 01.03.2013 under the garb of circular 1/2003 of MCA and not the disallowance of the claim of advance written off intended for purchases of land?" 2. It is submitted by the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant Revenue that this matter is covered under the Low Tax Effect as per the recent Circular dated 17.09.2024, in Circular No.9/2024. T.C.A.No.534 of 2023 3. Hence, this appeal stands dismissed, as covered under the low tax effect and the substantial questions of law arising in this appeal are kept open to be decided at the later point of time. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.S.K., J.) (C.S.N, J) 15.10.2024 Neutral Citation:Yes/No drm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.No.534 of 2023 R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC. SARAVANAN, J.(drm) T.C.A.No.534 of 2023 15.10.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan