Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxcorporate Circle – 2, Coimbatore v. M/S.purani Hospitals Supplies Pvt. Ltd

T.C.A.No.557 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15.10.2024 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMARAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN T.C.A.No.557 of 2023 Principal Commissioner of Income TaxCorporate Circle – 2, Coimbatore...Appellant Vs. M/s.Purani Hospitals Supplies Pvt. Ltd.No.117, Sengupta Street, RamnagarCoimbatore – 641 009PAN: AADCP 0574G..Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench,Chennaidated31.05.2023passedin I.T.A.No.489/CHNY/2022. For the Appellant : Mr.Karthik Ranganathan Senior Standing Counsel For the Respondent :Mr.Venkatanarayananfor M/s.Subbara Aiyar Padmanaban JUDGMENT (Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)The present tax case appeal was admitted on 27.11.2023 by this Court on the following substantial questions of law:- https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis "1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. ITAT is right in law in holding that addition u/s 69 cannot be made merely for the reason that the assessee had accepted the demonetized currency in violation of the circular / notification issued by the Government of India and the RBI? 2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. ITAT is justified in holding that there is no clarity in dealing with the specified Bank Notes from the date of demonetization to the appointed dated i.e. 31[st ]December, 2016, when the GOI and RBI had clearly notified the exempted categories for transacting in SBN vide several notifications wherein the business model of the assessee is not included?" 2. It is submitted by the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant Revenue that this matter is covered under the Low Tax Effect as per the recent Circular dated 17.09.2024, in Circular No.9/2024. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.No.557 of 2023 3. Hence, this appeal stands dismissed, as covered under the low tax effect and the substantial questions of law arising in this appeal are kept open to be decided at the later point of time. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.S.K., J.) (C.S.N, J) 15.10.2024 Neutral Citation:Yes/No drm T.C.A.No.557 of 2023 R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC. SARAVANAN, J. (drm) T.C.A.No.557 of 2023 15.10.2024